2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 605 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 SsangYong Musso. (307 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Lancia | SsangYong |
Model | Nea | Musso |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3197 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 307 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1975 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2640 mm |