2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1997 Mercury MC4
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury MC4 (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury MC4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1997 Mercury MC4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercury MC4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1997 Mercury MC4 | |
Make | Lancia | Mercury |
Model | Nea | MC4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4601 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 387 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |