2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1999 Acura TL
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura TL weights approximately 205 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura TL. (294 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1999 Acura TL | |
Make | Lancia | Acura |
Model | Nea | TL |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3210 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 294 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2750 mm |