2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1999 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lancia Lybra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lancia Lybra would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 Lancia Lybra. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1999 Lancia Lybra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lancia Lybra weights approximately 20 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lancia Lybra. (305 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lancia Lybra. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 1999 Lancia Lybra has manual transmission. 1999 Lancia Lybra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1999 Lancia Lybra | |
Make | Lancia | Lancia |
Model | Nea | Lybra |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2387 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1390 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2600 mm |