2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1999 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Lancia | Oldsmobile |
Model | Nea | Aurora |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3995 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2900 mm |