2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 140 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Nea | Mark II |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1988 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1510 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2600 mm |