2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 97 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S60. (285 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Lancia | Volvo |
| Model | Nea | S60 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2435 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1467 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2760 mm |
