2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 430 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Lancia | Jeep |
| Model | Nea | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3966 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |
