2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Lancia | MCC |
Model | Nea | Smart |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1124 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 314 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2510 mm |