2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (206 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2003 Mitsubishi Magna has manual transmission. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Nea | Magna |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2351 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2730 mm |