2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2004 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Acura CL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura CL weights approximately 210 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2004 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2004 Acura CL | |
| Make | Lancia | Acura |
| Model | Nea | CL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3212 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1580 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2750 mm |
