2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 105 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (241 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Nea | SLK |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 241 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2440 mm |