2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. (134 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 150 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Nea | C |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2148 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1520 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2720 mm |