2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 57 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura CSX has manual transmission. 2006 Acura CSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Lancia | Acura |
| Model | Nea | CSX |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1313 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |
