2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2006 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2006 Tata Sumo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2006 Tata Sumo. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2006 Tata Sumo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Tata Sumo weights approximately 510 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2006 Tata Sumo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Tata Sumo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Tata Sumo. (119 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Tata Sumo. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2006 Tata Sumo has manual transmission. 2006 Tata Sumo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2006 Tata Sumo | |
Make | Lancia | Tata |
Model | Nea | Sumo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1948 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 314 Nm | 119 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2410 mm |