2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2006 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Toyota Celica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 152 kg more than 2006 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Celica. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2006 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2006 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2006 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Nea | Celica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1218 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2610 mm |