2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2006 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 828 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.

Compare all specifications: