2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2009 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Lancia | Holden |
| Model | Nea | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
