2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 410 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (137 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Nea | 2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2500 mm |