2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (530 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Nea | ML |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 5461 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2920 mm |