2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (128 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 295 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Lancia | Chevrolet |
| Model | Nea | Orlando |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1665 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2760 mm |
