2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Lancia | Holden |
Model | Nea | Colorado |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 314 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |