2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Lancia | Jaguar |
| Model | Nea | XF |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2200 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2908 mm |
