2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 673 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (454 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Lancia | Jeep |
Model | Nea | Commander |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4701 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2043 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2790 mm |