2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2012 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2012 Ford Taurus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Taurus weights approximately 451 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Taurus (337 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2012 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Nea | Taurus |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3500 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 337 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1821 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2868 mm |