2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2012 Lexus LS
To start off, 2012 Lexus LS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lexus LS (380 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lexus LS weights approximately 603 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lexus LS (497 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2012 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 2012 Lexus LS | |
Make | Lancia | Lexus |
Model | Nea | LS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4600 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 497 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1973 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2969 mm |