2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2013 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Acadia weights approximately 742 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2013 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Lancia | GMC |
| Model | Nea | Acadia |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2112 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3020 mm |
