2001 Lancia Nea vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 110 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Lancia | Toyota |
| Model | Nea | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2600 mm |
