2001 Lancia Zeta vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Zeta would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2001 Lancia Zeta has manual transmission. 2001 Lancia Zeta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Zeta | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Lancia | Smart |
Model | Zeta | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1867 mm |