2001 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Freelander | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Land Rover | Acura |
| Model | Freelander | CSX |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
