2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
| Model | Range Rover | Renown |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 66 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
