2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Volkswagen |
| Model | Range Rover | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 52 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
