2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,332 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 (247 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 (500 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Range Rover | 600 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 247 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
