2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1964 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500.

Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1964 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1964 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: