2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (117 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Range Rover | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |
