2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1983 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Camry. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Camry. (143 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1983 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | Camry |
Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |