2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1994 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1994 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1994 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1994 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
| Model | Range Rover | Alto |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 59 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2180 mm |
