2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Cefiro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Nissan Cefiro | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | Cefiro |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
