2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1997 Mercedes-Benz C. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mercedes-Benz C. (171 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1997 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Range Rover | C |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |