2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 407 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Land Rover | Jeep |
Model | Range Rover | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |