2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Range Rover | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |