2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (460 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Range Rover | SL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 460 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |