2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2009 Lexus LS
To start off, 2009 Lexus LS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus LS (358 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus LS (466 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2009 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2009 Lexus LS | |
Make | Land Rover | Lexus |
Model | Range Rover | LS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 358 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 466 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3100 mm |