2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Land Rover | Acura |
Model | Range Rover | TL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2776 mm |