2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Citroen C4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Land Rover | Citroen |
Model | Range Rover | C4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |