2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse (277 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Traverse. (366 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Traverse.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Land Rover Range Rover | 2013 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Land Rover | Chevrolet |
Model | Range Rover | Traverse |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 277 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5173 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1991 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1846 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3020 mm |