2001 Lexus GS vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lexus GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lexus GS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Lexus GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lexus GS (225 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lexus GS should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lexus GS weights approximately 580 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Lexus GS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Lexus GS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lexus GS (298 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2001 Lexus GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2001 Lexus GS has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lexus GS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lexus GS | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lexus | Renault |
Model | GS | Clio |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |