2001 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (252 HP) has 168 more horse power than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon. (84 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2012 Lancia Ypsilon.
Because 2001 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2012 Lancia Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lincoln LS | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Lincoln | Lancia |
Model | LS | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 84 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2390 mm |