2001 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1977 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2001 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 700 more horse power than 1977 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1977 Triumph Stag. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Triumph Stag weights approximately 130 kg more than 2001 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 756 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Triumph Stag. (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Triumph Stag.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lotec C 1000 | 1977 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Lotec | Triumph |
Model | C 1000 | Stag |
Year Released | 2001 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1260 mm |