2001 Mahindra Armada vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Mahindra Armada is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 835 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Because 2001 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mahindra Armada | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4630 mm |
